InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HokieHead

08/18/23 10:11 AM

#143159 RE: Jayman5000 #143156

Lmfao!!! And those links, that refer to nothing pertinent to the current state of GVSI is useful information! What a hoot!!!

Jayman, the hub savior that hasn’t been right here once, can’t provide one open proceeding or case link from the SEC or FINRA on the current GVSI but backs outdated and falsified fairytale stories.

There’s no open proceeding or open case with FINRA or the SEC with GVSI, Good Vibrations Shoes, Allied Corp, Landmark Corp, Inca Hemp, or George Sharp.

FINRA current open actions:

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/oversight-enforcement/finra-disciplinary-actions-online

SEC open proceedings:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.htm

Shoot FINRA and the SEC an email, ask them what’s open vs GVSI, let me know what they say. Lmao.

Anything stating otherwise is a complete fairytale.

icon url

logic-commonsense

08/18/23 11:03 AM

#143176 RE: Jayman5000 #143156

Jayman - I'm going to take a leap of faith that you actually want to have a real conversation on this issue. Why do you suppose that GS is spending so much money on attorney's and accountant's fees filing petitions for share cancellations, motions for service by alternative means, bringing the stock off of the expert market to pink current, tweeting about name and symbol changes, and negotiating the withdrawal of the appeal on GVSI?? Is he doing this just to F with everyone and fool them into thinking he's going to ultimately execute a RM when in reality he has no intention of doing so? Yes, there were the FINRA rulings from the past versions of GVSI - however, do you REALLY think GS has not factored that into his decisions prior to spending this kind of money on a shell? What would he benefit from continuing to pursue GVSI if he didn't believe he can ultimately change the name/symbol and execute a RM. If you tell me how HE benefits from fooling us all then I might give you/Hi/Lo, Chrion, Starlost, etc. etc. some degree of attention. Without you providing a motive, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.