Replies to post #47027 on Mexus Gold US (MXSG)

[mahatmapaul]

Well, we don't have access to the underlying official documents, exept for this "synopsis/history" type of page, which translates very clunkily with all the spanish legal terms. But, the "action" is clearly by a son claiming he inherited the property from his father (intestamentary succession is the term used).

SUCESORIO INTESTAMENTARIO (FAMILIAR).- JESUS ARTURO ORTEGA VILLALOBOS,A BIENES DE JOSE JESUS ALBERTO ORTEGA BON
which google translates as INTESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION (FAMILY).- JESUS ??ARTURO ORTEGA VILLALOBOS, TO THE ASSETS OF JOSE JESUS ??ALBERTO ORTEGA BON

The above party(ies) apparently claimed they own the property, and by what's shown below, it appears an eviction notice was given.

Scroll towards the end to:

21-10-2022 Tercera Secretaría 1387/2017
ORDINARIO CIVIL - JESUS ARTURO ORTEGA VILLALOBOS, SUCESION A BIENES DE JOSE JESUS ALBERTO ORTEGA BON VS PAUL DWIGHT THOMPSON

The third column (SYNTHESIS) displays ACUSA REBELDIA.- SE HACE EFECTIVO APERCIBIMIENTO.- SE CITA OIR SENTENCIA DEFINITIVA.- SE LEVANTA COMPUTO.-183.-, which google very clunkly translates as ACCUSES REBELLIOUSNESS.- WARNING IS MADE EFFECTIVE.- HEARING FINAL JUDGMENT IS APPOINTED.- COMPUTATION IS LIFTED.

Then we have:

16-11-2022 Tercera Secretaría 1387/2017
ORDINARIO CIVIL .- JESUS ARTURO ORTEGA VILLALOBOS, SUCESION A BIENES DE JOSE JESUS ALBERTO ORTEGA BON VS PAUL DWIGHT THOMPSON

Here, the third column display SE DICTA SENTENCIA DEFINITIVA., which translates as FINAL JUDGMENT IS GIVEN.-

But, what is the final judgment? Against the plaintiffs, or against PT and his cronies?

If you go back up into the document (sometime in 2020, I think) you have the following passage (very clunky google translation):

PAUL DWIGTH THOMPSON, who must answer personally and directly, without the assistance of a lawyer or proxy, the list of positions that the plaintiff will exhibit on the day of the relief of the same, for which THIRTEEN HOURS OF NOVEMBER NINETEENTH OF TWO THOUSAND TWENTY are indicated, warning the same that in case of not appear on the day and time indicated without justification, confession of each and every one of the positions qualified as legal and appropriate will be declared, likewise the offeror is warned that in case of not appearing on the day and time indicated without justified cause or not I will present the list of positions, the test will be considered void; the foregoing based on articles 271,272, 273, 274 and 275, all of the Code of Civil Procedures for the State of Sonora..."

If I had to bet on this, I would say its more likely that the FINAL VERDICT was against PT, and not the plaintiff.

WHY DIDN'T PT LET US KNOW ABOUT THIS?? FIDUCIARY DUTY ANYONE?? Well, PT seems to be suffering lo these past 7 years from Bidenitis, and a very bad case at that.