InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TRUISM

08/13/23 5:05 AM

#265486 RE: Bob Mullet #265485

I was considering that as a possibility myself.

You show the TRUTH in filings; for arguments sake let's review the annual shareholder meeting lack of

information presented.

One of the responses was "the SEC doesn't care."

Now that's an off the cuff remark, if I ever saw one.

Almost as if "let me say anything in defense; merely for the heck of it."

Then the going after the poster, as opposed to the issue with the stock.

Not saying something nefarious is definitely afoot but certainly possesses the earmarks of it.

In this day and age, nothing surprises me.

Look at big companies that provide financials and the like to their shareholders, year in and out, only to

find out something wasn't quite right with the company.

The expected response would be "I'd know better; not the company I'm invested in."

Unfortunately many a multi-millionaire and retiree thought that same thing, as supposed facts were presented to them.

So when I ask for a little proof and it's met with scathing remarks on a personal level, it makes me wonder what is really transpiring, as getting to the TRUTH is less important than actually getting to the bottom of things by obtaining concrete evidence.

Some take the company at their word; even though they've slighted shareholders on several occasions; undeserving actions that warrant a benefit of the doubt mentality by those less concerned with ocular proof.

SEEING IS BELIEVING; not nicely prepared sedative words, to help you sleep better at night.



It’s occurred to me that people could not be possibly so stupid as the still champion this stock. So I ask myself what is their reasoning. My answer is nefarious reasons.





TRUISM
Bearish
Bearish
icon url

TRUISM

08/13/23 8:25 AM

#265505 RE: Bob Mullet #265485

I'm beginning to believe you're actually right.

When the TRUTH cannot be met head on, with a civil and logical discussion, pertaining to the

TOPIC AT HAND;

Even when asked to provide "an emotionless response," that certainly raises a red flag.

I'm talking Golden Delicious apples (metaphorically); they want to revert to spoiled nectarines

instead.


Apparently, they're M.O. lies below:



By bringing attention to the poster; feverishly overanalyzing as misdirection.

You'd think they'd possess and use more than one ineffective strategy.


Let them continue...Obsessive compulsive, with predatory ideations, is a thing apparently.

So I ask myself what is their reasoning. My answer is nefarious reasons.






TRUISM
Bearish
Bearish
icon url

DimesForShares

08/14/23 12:47 PM

#265630 RE: Bob Mullet #265485

Possibly nefarious reasons, but I wonder if some people have become so caught up in the fantasy of their long-delayed but wildly profitable success that they can’t stand any reality intruding on their dreams. Maybe they still believe in Santa Claus too, and reject all evidence to the contrary?