Replies to post #71217 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

It’s not missing, it’s private. It led……

me to ask myself why would the ONLY positive (ahem) research on Juno be removed from public view?

Unlike SFRX, MFT is respected in the industry, yet they emphatically deny Kyle’s claim. A claim that Kyle has vaguely made before. He was far more detailed in the now private video.

Anyone with the intelligence of a 5th grader would ROTF if they watched it.

So maybe what actually happened is someone within the SFRX inner circle convinced Kyle just how stupid it was and he hid it from public view.

How stupid does he think folks are?

The bigger issue really isn’t that the video was removed from public view, it’s that it was posted in the first place, and you and others drunk the Kool-Aid.

That’s right up there with the treasure is 5 miles from the biggest pile The Baer has ever seen and the worms pooped on the treasure and cannons, but not the big ole ballast pile.

You’re a really good fit with SFRX.

FYI, I noticed it was private when I was going to share it.

I’m not spending time on a “stock,” I’m spending time watching a comedy.

[Goldenboy17]

I see the trinket troll has to work on the weekends as well as holidays. Birthday too?

The one thing you can depend on is that the reason is 100% not whatever the non-shareholding trinket troll is pushing

I'll stick to my previous comments regarding the valuation video. Whatever you are guessing at is wrong. Again.

I'd go with technical error but what do I know, I'm just an actual shareholder.

But thanks for your 7 years of daily research and guesswork into a stock you don't own. I'm sure your audience of one appreciates it.

[zooey]

Pretty amazing the tenacity of a non shareholder. Does the same shit on another board I am in. However, he did own shares there while bashing the holy hell out of it and claiming to not hold shares.