Replies to post #63044 on Mullen Automotive Inc (MULN)

[TenKay]

Huh? I was trying to figure out if you meant an RS was good or bad for shorts?

You suggested that a 1 for 9 was good because anything above that would preclude another RS to “counter” the shorts.

“Sure, a 1:10 or higher ratio would've provided more of a buffer, but then no more reverse/splits could be utilized to counter the crooks that illegally short-and-distort this stock“

And then:

“Again, shorts would love nothing more than to short this stock into delinquency and delistment, which would likely mean a cheaper cover on the OTC.“

So my question, another way was….Why is a 1 for 9 so good when it pretty much guarantees a trip back to the OTC?

Sounds like you are saying that would be great for shorts.

You aren’t making much sense.