Which to summarise means exactly this.
At least one person inside Tautachrome was responsible for "the engagement of a consultant" knowing full well they were being paid and at least one person was engaged to perform promotional services without disclosing they were being paid or otherwise receiving pecuniary compensation for the same.
Oh and the gender of the consultant is male "His postings".
To my knowledge, there were no women in any positions of authority at TTCM at the time of this activity.
Therefore the 8K states quite categorically, that two persons (male) acting in concert, conspired knowingly to engage in activities that were in contravention of SEC rules. one inside the company and one external to it.
Can anyone tell me how this inference cannot be asserted from the statement made in that 8K (and put indelibly into the records of SEC filings for this company)?