And even better is you still keep omitting the reason for the change from the bank loan even though Nasrat the bogeyman is costing us less then the bank. now why would you omit that?
So you omitted the part regarding the actual reason for the change away from the bank and then you exaggerate it as a net negative when it was a net positive and was for much less money too but I digress...
Nice try. I am guessing its about 30m shares. not sure why this all bothers you. I mean after 10 years , someone with your alias playing this role of poor shareholder would have sold by now...
unless you were full of crap...which is pretty obvious. I mean, one year maybe, two years? possibly, 10 years...yeah you are full of crap plus your constant lying
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
