Replies to post #761661 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Will Lamberth rule against himself? If he does not, it would make for a stronger plaintiff’ case for a mistrial $fnma #fanniegate pic.twitter.com/9vK56SHcN2

— Fanniegate Hero (@DoNotLose) August 7, 2023

[EternalPatience]

Should he sit on the defendants lawyer bench

[stockanalyze]

can lamberth 2014 nws decsion be invalidated? he shows biasness, ignorance and clear intention to favor government and not the law and not the facts.

[Mnemonic]

What the fuck is this shit? It's so much worse than a sarcastic quip; it's clearly an attempt to influence the jury.

[jeddiemack]

lamberth should step down...

these two entities did not bring the world to its knees that's a false narrative and completel unsubstantiated lie. yet its repeated and dumb people believe it becuase its repeated often enough by people who should be smart enough to know its 100% wrong.

fact is ... these two entities never had negative cash flow from operations. its losses were attributable to cookie jar (fraudulent) accounting trickeration and once the scheme didn't materialize they reveresed the excess reserves and whammo .. profitability...

Fact is their credit losses were far more manageable than purported to be.

lies.. all dadgum lies...