The thing is, in the 1st trial Lamberth said, "...to SAVE US ALL", in a snarky sarcastic way and it came across to me in the audience as being sarcastic and skeptical of the Government's argument that they had to implement the NWS to "save us all.", which would be pro P. Subsequently he said a snarky comment about the "golden age wasn't here yet to make the required payment" which is pro D.
But Jurors remove any conscious or subconscious government bias a federal Judge may have.