InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockanalyze

08/05/23 7:56 PM

#761499 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #761497

"..and the alleged financial precariousness of the GSES in early 2012." and that is what i am saying why didn't they stop the moment it was crystal clear with dollar bills in front of their eyes that they were cash cows, they kept going and still going. not a credible argument. hope the plaintiff will say it during closing. i am just thinking like a juror, plain english, as if hearing for the first time.

"The Government Attorneys say that the Shareholders should have seen it coming.." only jim parrott saw it coming as far as we know and his intent is clear. his email is so relevant but lamberth won't allow. what kind of court is this?

old ed will say whatever rubbish he wants to.

"Shareholders are still free to buy and sell their shares. ", sure taken a huge loss already. how convenient to say it. how much do you get after they loot everything via nws? 40 cents for a $1500 stock.
icon url

Donotunderstand

08/06/23 5:30 PM

#761573 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #761497

memory is terrible

""""and the alleged financial precariousness of the GSES in early 2012""""

WTF ?

I - to chagrin of some super bulls here - can understand the impact of mark to market reduction in "paper reserves" and perceived or real fears of Chinese and or Russians selling MBS paper - (both to not lose money and to funk us)

But 2012 ??? .