Replies to post #760949 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Rodney5]

That's the problem, “The Scope of Evidence in this case is limited to that sole issue only... “Breach of Contract” That's laughable. The government with this unjust judge has limited the evidence down to practically nothing. The courts are putting the lawyers through and endless maze that leads to no where.

First off there is no “Implicit Contract”

THE CONTRACT FORCED ON THE COMPAINES EVERYONE CAN READ IT.

SENIOR PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Dated September 7, 2008.

link: https://www.fhfa.gov/Conservatorship/Documents/Senior-Preferred-Stock-Agree/FNM/SPSPA-amends/FNM-SPSPA_09-07-2008.pdf


MISTAKE

The lawyers are focused on the third amendment net worth sweep; IT IS NOT WORKING! By Public Law the whole contract is illegal, the contract is illegal based on the United States is not permitted to charge a commitment fee to be paid by the enterprises. The Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement is not a law: The SPSPA is an illegal contract.

THE CHARTER ACT IS THE LAW