Replies to post #760827 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Louie_Louie]

Then there's the cache of documents judges are CYA'ing for government that would blow this wide open. How many miscarriages of justice will be counted and how many judges reputations put in the crapper when those documents get revealed? Come on wiki leaks, come on hackers!

[Wise Man]

You are just exposing the corrupt organization peddling the Government theft story with emails, whereas the law and financial concepts state otherwise.
This organization needs you as essential part for the stock price manipulation and future stock offerings.
You fool no one.

[HappyAlways]

Navy, thanks again. We must show this email of Jim Parrott to the public again and again.

The NWS makes sure that a loaner can never repay his loan, and become a slave of the lender perpetually. They don't really care that Fannie and Freddie are private properties and should be returned to their shareholders.

[bradford86]

i disagree.

this case is about negligence.

the government talks this big story about how they saved the world with the nws and this and that --- but at the end of the day the main point is that they, in my view on purpose, did not have any documentation backing up why they took this action. they brag about getting away with it. i mean, they stole and lied and there is no supporting evidence because it was a heist.

in my view the lack of any substantial analysis about the transaction before it took place in isolation is enough to win this case. that is what this case was about if you followed the first trial

[stockanalyze]

we must flood the internet and media outlet with a copy of it. do we need more proof of the intent? this should outrage everyone. can we have a link to pdf where it is placed to forward to as many. we must forward this to every congressman, senator too. to elon musk and to everyone. enough is enough.

[basesloaded]

Sticky!

But skateboarder disagrees.

[krab]

The jury won't be shown the GOVT corruption illustrated, so this make no difference to the trial.
These plaintiff lawyers are NOT smart !!!
Some of the shareholders on this board could defend the shareholders case much better.

[Rodney5]

"The Jury needs to see ALL these examples of total Govt Corruption ..
"every dollar of profit they make" ... "they will NOT BE ALLOWED to return to profitable entities " ...

Even More Corruption...

Tim Howard Quote: "FHFA’s mandate that they keep issuing money-losing credit-risk transfer securities that its own consultant reported cost the companies $30 dollars in interest payments for every $1 of credit losses transferred in a normal environment, and $3 in interest for every $1 dollar transfer during an environment of severe stress." End of Quote...

https://howardonmortgagefinance.com/2023/06/05/response-to-fhfa-pricing-rfi/#comments

[Robert from yahoo bd]

I don't remember seeing the Jim Parrot Memo in the 1st trial, I'm pretty sure that the Jurors won't see it because the UST was removed as a Defendant in the case.

I hope I'm wrong, but I think that's right. I believe that the US Treasury is no longer a Defendant, therefore I think the FHFA lawyers got the memo kicked via a pretrial Evidentiary motion.