Who cares what a paid consultant says?. He is collecting a paycheck to say exactly what Qsep wants. Tao has lied for years about the efficacy and even when he gets challenged by actual scientists in the field he never admits he is wrong. (See his discussion with fuel injection combustion expert who ripped Tao’s combustion efficiency theories to pieces!) At this point, it’s of no consequence-if Qsep is lucky enough to score another field test today it will take another year to get it on the line and months more before investors know they been taken again!
“The AOT has the potential to reduce or eliminate dependence on chemical additives with an elegant electromechanical system. “
Basically a lie… even though he prefaces his view with the words: “potential to” the company itself readily admits it won’t eliminate diluents and since the other wild claim of magic turbulence reduction has also never been tested or proven, it’s unclear what angle Qsep is vying for. Obviously it looks like they are trying to pawn off a weakly developed college theory developed by a paid Temple professor as a green process that simultaneously removes dra and diluents. Two birds one stone solution. The problem is Mother Nature isn’t playing along!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
