didn't he do the same in first trial and we ended up with a hung jury. so not much weight to it.
can an attendee get up and shout when defense speaks "stop confusing the jury with your stupid interruptions, you have looted over 300 billion from mom and pop, retirees and from education of those who saved for their children than handing out $20,000 free to those who didn't work for it or saved their hard earned money. just stop from spewing nonsense and you are getting paid from shareholders money in the company, the very shareholders you are looting". would that be legal to say in the midst of the trial? i would not get into trouble for it as defense lawyers well know they are looting and lamberth may strike that comment anyways from jury seeing it?
it will be symbolic. but only if legal to do, someone should do it as press has been muffled, no coverage and the loot continues. $1500 share down to $0.40.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
