Replies to post #760372 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[JOoa0ky]

Ok. I think the wording is not ripe for the populace.

To win requires a unanimous decision.

However, if the unanimous decision comes from less than 6 jurors, the verdict is VOID and it goes back to retrial round #3.

No, 6 to Win, ONLY IF 6 Jurors are left to render a Verdict.

It must be unanimous, if there's a Split amongst the 8 Jurors (even 1) then the Judge will tell them to keep deliberating until they reach a unanimous Verdict, like he did last time (aka a Dynamite Charge to the Jury from the Judge).

After 4 or 5 'Dynamite Charges', to the Jury from the Judge and still no unanimous Verdict, then Mistrial and Round 3.

[jog49]

"It must be unanimous, if there's a Split amongst the 8 Jurors (even 1) then the Judge will tell them to keep deliberating until they reach a unanimous Verdict, like he did last time (aka a Dynamite Charge to the Jury from the Judge)."

This was written into law and stacks the government , however corrupt, against the citizens of the country; requiring a unanimous decision in in a civil case.
A citizen is at a disadvantage from the git-go.