George has unwound the past mess with $GVSI at the state level and now has 2 years of fins to report to FINRA and the SEC for Name and Ticker change. That's the way it works, and that's the way he is doing it.
FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.
These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.
The Inca Hemp (GVSI) corporate actions (name and ticker change) never took place because it was blocked by SEC/FINRA and it will be blocked again because GVSI is unaudited, delinquent with the SEC and is not SEC registered and reporting.
That's the same lie you unsuccessfully tried before, just like your lie about GVSI being SEC registered.
GVSI has to account for what the SEC and FINRA are demanding and Sharp can't provide - audited GVSI financial statements.
...the Notice of Deficiency pursuant to FINRA Rule 6490 still stands and proves that there is a current SEC restriction on GVSI's corporate actions because of GVSI's deficiency/delinquency.
Keep in mind that there has already been a decision made FINRA (and the decision was affirmed) on GVSI's deficiency/delinquency and a restriction on corporate actions for GVSI was placed and the SEC just keeps extending the date to allow GVSI the opportunity to resolve the delinquencies which it has not.