InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DimesForShares

07/17/23 9:53 AM

#263477 RE: want2retire #263419

In addition to the language Thompson used in the PR, we also have the financial statements that address the inventory of silk. The small value of silk in inventory suggests the amount produced was small at best, tiny is certainly possible.

Pretty solid evidence, if you ask me.
icon url

Deannie

07/17/23 10:15 AM

#263479 RE: want2retire #263419

Saying the quantity produced was “tiny” is not proven with comments about the lack of a PR stating 100s of kilos were produced. That is not proof of anything.”

SURE IT IS. Yes, my “opinion” was validated as fact by the “tiny” $6K+ of inventory which may or may not even be entirely derived from silk. So at MOST, there was $6K worth of silk produced in the “biggest batch ever” which also proves Kim’s misrepresentation - intentionally deceptive use of language - misled some shareholders to believe there was more silk than was actually produced. Do the math to estimate just how little silk that actually is. Could some of it have been sent out as samples, lowering the amount in inventory? Sure, but not by much.