“Saying the quantity produced was “tiny” is not proven with comments about the lack of a PR stating 100s of kilos were produced. That is not proof of anything.”
SURE IT IS. Yes, my “opinion” was validated as fact by the “tiny” $6K+ of inventory which may or may not even be entirely derived from silk. So at MOST, there was $6K worth of silk produced in the “biggest batch ever” which also proves Kim’s misrepresentation - intentionally deceptive use of language - misled some shareholders to believe there was more silk than was actually produced. Do the math to estimate just how little silk that actually is. Could some of it have been sent out as samples, lowering the amount in inventory? Sure, but not by much.