Replies to post #759231 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Fannie Heyyyyy]

Let's hope they see it the same way.

[Wise Man]

FHFA is different.

[Robert from yahoo bd]

From the 132 lawmakers Amicus Brief: "And while then-Director
Mulvaney endeavored to answer Senators’ questions
when he appeared before the Senate Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee in 2018, he
noted that “it would be my statutory right to just sit
here and twiddle my thumbs while you all ask
questions.” Max Greenwood, Mulvaney in Senate
Testimony: I’m Required to Be Here, But Not to Answer
Your Questions, The Hill (Apr. 12, 2018),
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/382842-
mulvaney-in-senate-testimony-im-required-to-be-
here-but-not-to-answer-your/.

It likewise should come as no surprise that the
CFPB itself has long bragged that its revenues were
“non-appropriated funds.” See Adam J. White, The
CFPB Engages in Legal Deception, Wall St. J. (Dec. 4,
2022). The CFPB even maintained that position in
litigation in an attempt to dodge bid protests.
3 Only
now does the CFPB change its tune."

[Golfbum22]

Do our dumb lawyers know this yet?

Lmao

[Ace Trader]

It's all falling into place !
SCOTUS gave Congress time to sort there shxt out. Now congress sent the letter to SCOTUS stating hey we want control of funding! SCOTUS will uphold the 5TH court ruling you bet ya!
Where does that leave the FHFA ??? SCOTUS really shot them selfs i the foot with (Collins case)

[3antar]

Humm very interesting, can't wait to see what happens going forward ??