InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Fannie Heyyyyy

07/03/23 10:17 AM

#758796 RE: trunkmonk #758795

Yes
icon url

Donotunderstand

07/03/23 10:19 AM

#758797 RE: trunkmonk #758795

on a softer basis

Any head of FHFA has a good job and no pressure from any part of GOV to change things as F and F are doing a GREAT job of liquidity for housing

they can hire or fire or whatever --- but in pure form - if the head of FHFA believes a FREE F and F would not do a better job of providing liquidity to banks and others issuing mortgages --- and might be more prone to a RUN on their Bonds -- they do nothing

That is part of the reason some of us are FNMKING mad at COURTS not calling this a clear taking of our property for no compensation - a violation of the constitution
icon url

Louie_Louie

07/03/23 10:26 AM

#758798 RE: trunkmonk #758795

The Congress, Treasury and the FHFA director are very much like those three monkey's you see, one with its eyes covered, one with its mouth covered and one with its ears plugged. But...instead of hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil, it's more apropriate to say they hear no reasonable common sense, speak no reasonable common sense, or see no reasonable common sense. Jmho.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

jog49

07/03/23 11:14 AM

#758805 RE: trunkmonk #758795

I suspect FHFA wants the public to believe that it RUNS Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when we all know that the management has always RUN the GSEs. Any regulation done can be done by the corporations or an oversight board meeting once a year; NOT requiring a 700 employee bureaucracy that wasted $ millions of the corporations' money every year. Don't lose sight of the fact that Fannie and Freddie PAYS for that garbage dump known as FHFA.