Imaginary? Lol how much more evidence would one need to see? And I've never followed an author on their platform nor do most it's not 1995. What matters is number of eyes who see it or "views" over a given period and the content and evidence contained in it. It's what a real story and author is vs a hit job like was tried on Wes and GTII...and you can tell that's what it was because of the overwhelming evidence that naked shorting does exist and happen in multiple enforcement actions. It's hilarious when people assume the intelligence of retail investors is low...so blatant ROTFL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
