InvestorsHub Logo

ImjinBridger

06/29/23 8:12 AM

#262749 RE: fza #262744

Would a lawyer who knows the full extent of culpability (of lying is what you infer) continue this for over a decade and put him and his familiy's future in such jeopardy?


No, he certainly would not. But all it takes is a few well-placed words like, expect, hope, and plan. Then voilà, it's not a lie.

Deannie

07/12/23 10:27 AM

#263192 RE: fza #262744

The notion that Kim wouldn’t “lie” because of the legal implications falls apart when it’s realized that Kim (generally) doesn’t lie. He hints at, suggests, implies and most importantly, keeps on trying - all sufficiently buffered, legally, with disclaimers and language that otherwise provides a backdoor exit for any “claims” that do not come to pass. He does what he does BECAUSE he knows the law is on his side - as long as he keeps on trying to produce (even if he doesn’t believe in the likelihood of production success).