InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JRyan

06/11/23 10:27 PM

#52985 RE: KyOil #52984

I tend to agree with most of this.


I tried to comment but...

Anyhow, thanks KyOil.
icon url

Bruce_Mcdonalds

06/12/23 3:49 PM

#52986 RE: KyOil #52984

Just a question:
Do environmentalists ban fracking because of the chemicals or water used which might cause environmental damage to the underground geography?

Or do they ban it because it cracks the earth, which fouls the underground geography, cross, contaminates aquafers, and causes earthquakes?

Think like an environmentalist. No matter how environmentally friendly fracking is, it still cracks the earth. For the fracking operation, I think the new Halliburton electric system is the best at environmental friendliness, no diesel pumps, no diesel at all: all 100% electric, fracks with 99% water which safely evaporates away and dissipates, no environmental damage. Never the less, it still cracks the earth! Which is the point, and problem, with fracking in the first place.
icon url

IRisky

06/13/23 1:56 PM

#52990 RE: KyOil #52984

KyOil, I really enjoy your posts. They are informative is an understatement
I get more information out of a single post of yours than I do ZN's BOD for a year.

how do you come up with all this information ??
Why does ZN not give it to us ?

Remember how (I can't recall his name) was holding up a shot glass of oil and declaring success?
That still haunts me - and the trust factor.

Best of luck to us all.