Replies to post #118406 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[Youarewhereyouare]

Man the mumbo jumbo and liking all over one anothers spin of what was plain an simply a losing battle that they conceeded to is something to behold. Hard to believe they would do it after all Well they just did. I guess you need more time to for it to sink in.

[loophole lawyer]

“With the California cases behind us”……no mention if the cases were stipulated with or without prejudice……sorry…. But these footprints lead me to a different path than many are concluding…..only my useless opinion!

[DeerBalls]

Thanks, loop! This is just amazing to me:

We should have never sued goog/meta anyone or who could be put to ca, BUT THIS ISN'T CRITICAL OF OUR ATTORNEYS?.......We sued a number of defendants in Waco, well BEFORE the system started coming down on Judge Albright. I would bet 100 to 1 that Judge Albright, prior to all the bs, would have kept all in Waco! Ok, things start coming down on Judge Albright, so he took a few and kicked a few to ca, BEING PRAGMATIC! So, as a result, VPLM, as ridiculous as it is, was fighting the same patents in two jurisdictions!!!

I just love the Monday morning quarterbacking: WE SHOULDN'T HAVE SUED ca FIRMS! WHAT ABOUT amzn, primarily out of metro Seattle?

We are out of ca AND THIS IS A HUGE "SURPRISE", NO MATTER WHAT THE MARKET DOES IN SHORT RUN!

Then, we have a PR out! I thought lack of PRs was THE HUGE PROBLEM??? It's out and, boo-hoo, the stock is down a bit! SO WHAT! DID VPLM GO DIRECTLY TO $.45 AFTER THE aapl IPR WINS? NO IT DIDN'T!!

Thanks again, loop! Be well!

BTW, I have met many, many VPLM shareholders over the years! I have been fielding alot of calls today and the enjoyment and concerns have been all over the spectrum! I AM CONSISTENT WITH THIS BEING GREAT NEWS!

You hit the nail on the head…… I find it hard to believe that our legal team had the talent to go toe to toe with Amazon….. but were blindsided by the California Court……A legal team doesn’t take a patent infringement case as far as they did in the California Court ( on their own dime) and then decide to tell their client to forget about litigating in this state……. That would be malpractice. A stipulation to dismiss ( with each paying their own legal fees) may occur when there is a settlement agreement. Depending how the agreement is negotiated, both parties do not need to disclose the agreement immediately. Just pointing out one of the “POSSIBLE CHESS MOVES” that our VERY TALENTED LEGAL TEAM may have engaged in…..