Ahhhhhhhh, WHAT? I really, really thought about it and could make ZERO sense out of this!! Well, I guess I know the meaning of all the words used, just not when they are put together in the fashion below!
Someone may prosper in a bump of VPLM PPS(unless he/she doesn't), IF he was a direct/indirect, large shareholder of VPLM, there wouldn’t be some complaint for some effect??
"It wouldn't be of any benefit I"??? How about benefit II or maybe benefit III?
"Telling the truth"? Truth about what?
Speculation of some con's willingness to turn down close to "2 hundred million Canadian"? 2 hundred million Canadian what?
I thought about it, then it came to me: I AM VERY THANKFUL EMIL IS IN CONTROL OF VPLM AND BECAUSE OF THAT FACT, VPLM IS SITTING IN ITS BEST POSITION EVER! AND, VPLM IS FINALIZING A DEAL WITH amzn!