My challenge stands. Get back to me when the share price is in-line with and is reflective of the supposed "billions and billions" of "ongoing" patent infringements that the CEO claims are happening. The amount of revenue generated from this if true would be staggering and not a company with a share price below .10 If the share price isn't easily $50+ and significantly higher then this indicates that the patents are not what has been stated. It's really that simple.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
