InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Yolo

05/29/23 10:12 AM

#64778 RE: MBADude #64774

The fact that you took the time to respond to this while on vacation shows that you know your case is shaky and on borrowed time. Only you can read the SC's carefully worded letter as being in Calasse's favor. The SC will deal a decisive blow and make sure another Calousee situation doesn't happen in future on other custodianship.



So many blatantly wrong assumptions.

I took the time to reply because I was laughing at the one sided quote and desperate attempt to make a positive out of a negative.

Never said I was on vacation, it is just the weekend. I regularly check this forum on the weekend because it amuses me.

Even just "The SC will deal a decisive blow and make sure another Calousee situation doesn't happen in future on other custodianship" is hilarious. Why would the NVSC feel the emotions that you do? They just interpret the law.

I think you're right, they will make a decisive decision to make sure that this doesn't happen in future custodianships. Except I'm referring to trying to piggyback a share cancellation off of a custodianship case to avoid providing legal notice to shareholders. Everyone can keep ignoring that that is what happened, but the NVSC won't.
icon url

BigMoneyChalupa

03/30/24 12:45 AM

#68599 RE: MBADude #64774

Amen MBA Dude. Marking this for the upcoming ruling from the SC.

The SC will deal a decisive blow and make sure another Calousee situation doesn't happen in future on other custodianship. In the annals of the SC/OTC history, Calasse v. Sharp will be quoted for decades when future appeals from GOFF type scam CEOs come up demanding justice after share cancellation. This is an important case and you are by association (with the stock) important. Like many others of course. Unfortunately, the bad guys can't win the war and GS will land that victory. Perhaps in 2024 but that is ok.

Happy Easter everyone. Hopefully Calasse is officially toast here soon.
Bullish
Bullish