stock_observer_77, Links as evidence support what one says. For you to suggest anyone would post links which disagree with their
own assertions can only be taken as idiocy. In fact most of my links are simply added information, is all. See my next post.
"You provide links that support what you believe
If you believe the sky is orange you will post links from sources suggesting the same and disbar
others that suggest otherwise who post links noting what they post is invalid and disinformation
You know me well enough from posts to suggest I’m not trustworthy - You’re an idiot - and another tactic you use - making outlandish
comments and assumptions based on nothing. Please refrain from evaluating me as your basis in doing so has no merit - zero - none!
Furthermore you thrive on solid words like I feel it seems that are as frivolous as you are
Game theory
Corruption is everywhere in politics."
Stuff here is only seen as disinformation and misinformation if it is.
Yes, i and others know you are not trustworthy as you have told us by repeatedly posting easily debunkable junk. Those that don't trust you have only you to thank for that. Thank you for that. The only trustworthy stuff i've read of yours is the stuff about your cars. I believe that. Well done there. You established yourself as trustworthy in that sphere.
Now you know how i know you, how many times are you going to repeat your last two comments above. We know some politics is corrupt. And we know your petrol is game theory. You say politics is all corrupt. We know it isn't all corrupt, and we have clearly shown you which side of politics has had the most criminal convictions. It is clear on the evidence which is the most corrupt party.
Your "Furthermore...." i have no idea what that sentence means. Could you please try again with that one.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
