Replies to post #95451 on Niocorp Developments Ltd (NB)

[PutzMueler]

If you recall I stated our reverse split should start us off at the listing requirements and save us some share count, because it was more likely that we would go up from $5, then we would from $10.
Instead I lost 90% of my share count and we still dropped to the listing requirements.

But I wasn’t able to make my point without being called an idiot by you and Max and Skifund and a couple of Belgians.

And now you are asking,
“Who would have thought“

Maybe the question you should be posing is,
“who didn’t think”?

Now I’ll just go back to making hardwood.

Shrug

[Truth and Transparency]

Seriously, you might want to think before you speak. Funny how quiet AO is about the wonderful things that the merger and listing on NASDAQ would be.

[Prudent Capitalist]

ski: We are not in danger of listing requirements. We more than met the requirement for initial listing, but once listed there are no NASDAQ listing or compliance issues unless a security has a closing bid below $1.00 for 30 days, and then there is a long period to regain compliance, which I believe is by closing above $1.00 for 10 straight trading days. This is clearly not an issue here with NB.