I don't think it puts to rest that he lied, it just gives him an excuse. Kind of like how FORW bought warrants for $200k in July and then in March the warrants were unilaterally canceled by FORW because of some acquisition that never happened. WNFT never received the $200k they were entitled to, and you can't unilaterally cancel the agreement 8 months later. The FORW "acquisition" is a convenient excuse for breaching the contract that never existed, but it's all lies.
I think, if anything, Sharp is giving ammunition for a breach of fiduciary duty case against himself. If he was CEO of only WNFT, he wouldn't have allowed FORW to breach the contract. But since he's CEO of FORW and WNFT, he engineered it that way. If the merger candidate would have been lucrative for WNFT, he breached his duty by not pursuing it even if it required a settlement.
Sharp hasn't brought any assets into FORW and he has been the CEO for going on 5 years.
Certainly no mergers lined up and in that time Zero revenue.
Sharp asked the court to expedite the hearing to gain Custodianship (or shell hijacking) and Sharp failed to properly notify the previous management - even saying that Calasse didn't exist. Sharp tried this on two other shells and those cases were dismissed because of the malfeasance of Sharp.
Sharp stated he needed to have the hearing expedited because he had a merger candidate lined up and that wasn't true.
Sharp tried a pumping trick by changing the name and ticker symbol to catch a trend - hopefully no one was so naive to believe that GOFF/WNFT isn't anything but a empty shell.
Sharp will never have a real NFT company do a reverse merger with GOFF/WNFT which is a hijacked shell.