InvestorsHub Logo

HokieHead

05/07/23 8:44 AM

#129940 RE: Hi_Lo #129939

Sharp, your ticker is toast, why are you paying lawyers, auditors, accountants to keep the process moving? Sharp, why do you continue to have court hearings if your ticker is toast? Sharp, why did you change the name with the Nevada SOS if your ticker is toast? Sharp, why did you start merger discussions if your ticker is toast?

What an absolute hoot!!! I cannot stop laughing my ass off.

HokieHead

05/07/23 8:45 AM

#129941 RE: Hi_Lo #129939

The FINRA legal proceeding is being addressed and again, why do they keep extending it? For more paperwork, more money, or just for fun?

The real action goes as follows:
1. The first area to be addressed is the state level which authorizes shares and also keeps record in the state's escrow agency and the courts.
2. The next level is FINRA, which reviews all the collected information from the state level issuer.
3. Next is the SEC level but they follow from the origin aka the state of Nevada and FINRA.

Clearly my understanding that Sharp didn’t abandon GVSI or make assumptions like it would never get off the expert market proved correct.

What’s even more funny than those claims is GVSI is going to be “suspended” yet all these changes are being made, Sharp is having court hearings for the ticker and is in merger discussions.

It’s funny, the only GVSI fallacies left are based on timelines, and trying to address them as “issues” and “will never happen” but they all end up playing out and then those fallacies are quickly forgotten and don’t matter? :-(