InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Wise Man

05/02/23 1:52 AM

#754113 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #754086

The powers of FHFA are clear and limited.
The reason why the "for cause" removal restriction of the FHFA Director was constitutional.
As clear as the separate account plan authorized in the conservator's Incidental Power: "take any action authorized by this section, in the best interests of FnF or the FHFA".
Quit bringing constitutional issues to Fanniegate, which is a scandal involving the corrupt litigants that have covered up the key statutory provisions in court, for stock price manipulation, hand in hand with the counterpart, the DOJ attorneys with "Yes, we stole it all":
-Restriction on capital distributions in the FHEFSSA and the CFR1237.12. Exceptions: reduce the SPS and recap (separate account)
-The conservator's Rehab power or function.
-Their special borrowing right from UST.
-The Fee Limitation of United States.
To name a few.
You have covered up "authorized by this section" (like judge Sweeney and the Supreme Court) and, in this post, that §4617(f) "not subject to judicial branch review" is about "in the exercise of powers or functions of the Agency as conservator" (also covered up by the poster called Ano)
You belong to The Tipp-Ex Gang.
icon url

Donotunderstand

05/02/23 12:10 PM

#754166 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #754086

gotcha ---- and ---- at same time --- substitute unelected Judges for the agency staff you hate so much and is that not as true?