Replies to post #752874 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[KenKong]

It really is a “BOOM!”

[chessmaster315]

We may not have arrived yet, but we know where we are going!

The rule of law will prevail, the government will no longer be able to steal shareholders pensions and dividends, and should have to return money already stolen.

[stockanalyze]

plaintiff lawyers don't read tweets or ihub. are they working on to file in Collins, Bhatti, Rop and Wazee? oterwise we keep our rants on this board and means nothing. send it to lawyers please if you have their contact.

[chessmaster315]

Sticky, so this does not get lost.

[TwoNickleTony]

Interesting my hope is that all classes do well. I am more inclined to believe JPS do well before commons. But I really don’t know and we are all guessing till a compiling event happens that will resolve this long draw out drama.

[Donotunderstand]

OK
So the castration of judges section is dead

How does one re try the past cases - now?

Or is this simply too late for any action ?

(Strange that SCOTUS did not do this in the first SCOTUS round - instead noting courts could weigh in if Z or A ---v this decision which says the "clause" is out --- and its the same 9 judges - no?)

[basesloaded]

Sticky

[kthomp19]

is Supreme Court 9-0 unanimous GAME CHANGER

Ruling for previously dismissed Fannie / Freddie Lawsuits ?

I'm glad you framed that as a question, because the answer is "no".

I already wrote one post explaining why ano's first argument is wrong, and another post explaining why ano's second argument is wrong.

Thank you for putting these two incorrect arguments from ano in the same place so that we can be aware of the dangers of taking what he has to say seriously. The Supreme Court said he's wrong on both counts.

[Ace Trader]

Then ALL the taking cases Must be re- submitted for review!!! ?

[stockprofitter]

They finally got it RIGHT! LETS GOOOOO!!!

[skeptic7]

from ano: "@fanniemae and @freddiemac lawsuits can no longer be dismissed on "no court can take action" the Perry precedent is thus retracted, it basically means Collins, Bhatti, Rop and Wazee, upfront won their case on the merits, FHFA MAY thus not do as it pleases per SCOTUS"

Really?

[FOFreddie]

This is interesting - Thanks Navy. My guess is we will have to see another Amended Complaint from Wazee - also I believe the Mike Kelly Amended Complaint is due tomorrow before Judge Davis. Wonder if Axon will be cited. The other litigation that could include this is Brydon Fisher's.

[juicyjuice10002]

What in your opinion is the next step in light of this ruling? Will this bring the parties to negotiating table?

[ewtrader]

Navy - any updates to this ? TIA

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Lunch time! Court will commence again at 115pm

[ewtrader]

Code ~ Hasta la vista, baby “Boooom ! is Supreme Court 9-0 unanimous GAME CHANGER
Ruling for previously dismissed Fannie / Freddie Lawsuits ? … “

Ano
@Ano3020100

Last Friday in Axon v. FTC the SCOTUS ruled “Statutory provisions do not preclude a court from ruling” FHFAs statutory provision 12 U.S. Code § 4617(f)” no court may take any action” IS THUS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!, this was the only provision responsible for dismissing cases, WOW
11:05 AM April 16, 2023