This is exactly why Clayton wants to talk on the phone and does not like to conduct any info-business via e-mails anymore. He used to be good at it (returning e-mails), and then realized that a comment in an e-mail can be referenced and repeated, and statements made in them can be held to standard. A phone discussion can be dismissed, denied, misinterpreted, and can be easily manipulated and guided by a good talker/salesman.
For instance, in the past few posts, we have learned that Clayton told one person that the assets have already been sold and the money was used for something else (never reported in a PR, of course). Then we see that someone else talking to him on the phone more recently, when pressed on the issue, reported Clayton was ironically just going to a meeting in 30 minutes with the prospective buyer to possibly get better worth for them - i.e. not give the assets away for no value, etc.
There is really nothing much that can be confirmed about this company other than what Clayton reports. It's up to the individual to determine what to make of what he either tells them, or avoids discussing. I'd say the scenario above is as good a reason for anyone to not blindly follow his verbiage. Others with a ton of shares will of course dispute that fiercely, for obvious reasons.
To each their own. Sounds like plenty of questions being asked here that are appropriate, mark. Good luck in your search for the truth.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
