InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Omar8

04/05/23 6:52 PM

#35493 RE: AlwaysRed #35492

5 years ago.....






Silver was $10 less an ounce....if that is the best their control can do, I'm cool with that.

I loaded up around mid teens in 2018...I remember getting Franklin half dollars rolls for $120 range, I bought a boat load of them....glad I didn't let their control scare me away from that.
icon url

tootalljones

04/06/23 7:33 AM

#35496 RE: AlwaysRed #35492

what has caused the banksters to "let" the silver price rise 6 bucks from recent lows? This is a 33 percent loss to their money and their digital accounts?
Why have they let gold move up 400 bucks from the recent lows of 1,635? Why would they let themselves be gutted like this? Since there are no constraints on their powers?
Why have they let copper almost double the last 5 years? Their accounts would have suffered a near 100 percent loss? You will say, it is just a "paper loss," but still, the masters of the world do not want to come into work and see after five years, that their losses (continuing up to this very moment) approach 100 percent in the copper market at this time?
What about the nickel, where their 'digital" or paper losses are more than 100 percent the past 5 years, and then there is the uranium market, where their losses (just paper losses you will say) are horrendous the last couple years? Or how about their zinc losses, lead losses and tin losses (paper losses you will say). Is it their design, since they can do anything at any time, to incur one hundred (100) percent losses almost in all these industrial metals? Banksters don't like any loss, at any time, no matter how small, especially if they have the power, in your words, to easily crush even a 2 or 3 or even 4 percent "paper" loss in any of the metals.