Replies to post #80273 on CV Sciences Inc (CVSI)

[Wolf-man jack]

WISE WQLF SAYS; The WISE WQLF never stated the the Pablo Cruise was a “Pretty Good Analyst YQU DI Understand. So YQU consider this Slavic Analyst a “Pretty Good Analyst.” He has no idea what he is analyzing YQU Now Understand YQU Understand. He should not be able to hold the title as a Wall Street analyst and instead a Wallpaper Analyst in the WISE WQLF’s opinion. Have Mercy Have Nordic Naturals and CV Sciences Omega PlusCBD Partnership Have Faith WQLF Ahooooooo


Giminny Cricket Said;

Pablo Zuanic, yes he is a pretty good analyst. But in either late 2020 or early 2021 he also mentioned no obvious near-term catalysts, and dropped this one like a rock. Turns out, after 2 years looking back, he was absolutely correct in doing so.

Note no analyst has been covering this one this year, nobody, nor IMO should they, I mean come on now https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171541362.

Dr. Joong J Fang Said; The Itsy itsy bitsy spider web stocking holder Charlatan’s spew the fact that CVSI has No analysts covering the company. Who gives a rats anus that the analysts aren’t covering CVSI, when those same analysts covering the dismal itsy itsy bitsy spider web company stock are useless and continue to be a complete failure, including the Slavic analyst considered as “Pretty Good.”

Pablo Zuanic
Cantor Fitzgerald
Wall Paper Analyst

Success Rate
39%
144 out of 371 transactions made a profit
Average Return
+2.00%
Average return per transaction

https://www.tipranks.com/experts/analysts/pablo-zuanic

Wolfman Jack Says

[Wolf-man jack]

WISE WQLF SAYS; Why would one consider Pablo Zuanic being a “Pretty Good Analyst.”His rating and Fail Rate is Dismal YQU Now Understand YQU Understand. CVSI is better off without Analysts that are incompetent YQU Now Understand. Have Mercy Have Nordic Naturals and CV Sciences Omega PlusCBD Partnership Have Faith WQLF Ahooooooo

GE JIM SAID: Because he is doing a Great Job analyzing Charlotte’s Web. IMO Lollipops . ;

Pablo Zuanic, yes he is a pretty good analyst. But in either late 2020 or early 2021 he also mentioned no obvious near-term catalysts, and dropped this one like a rock. Turns out, after 2 years looking back, he was absolutely correct in doing so.

Note no analyst has been covering this one this year, nobody, nor IMO should they, I mean come on now.

Dr. Joong J Fang Said; Lollipops

Pablo Zuanic
Cantor Fitzgerald
Wall Paper Analyst

Success Rate
39%
144 out of 371 transactions made a profit
Average Return
+2.00%
Average return per transaction

https://www.tipranks.com/experts/analysts/pablo-zuanic