Accusing critics of not owning shares is such an idiotic argument.
It doesn't address any of the substantive issues or valid criticism, and instead tries to distract from it by attacking the messenger.
I'm personally the proud owner (well, really just the owner) of $30k worth (no wait, it's now only about $8k worth) of GVSI.
I reserve the right to critize GVSI, Sharp, his lawyers, myself, and God himself regardless of the current state of my investment portfolio.