Replies to post #8470 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[goalydad1]

ifida
What in the world is wrong with you?? Sticking with Dr. Tony - a brilliant world reknown scientist over one of our own resident bashers - Frogscheming?? LOL.

I will grant that Frogman is a better class of basher than most. But if you look up 'ARROGANCE' in Websters you just might find his name as the definition.

Always enjoy your posts. Goalydad

[frogdreaming]

ifida,

Thank you for granting me the right to hold an opinion, that is more than most permit here. However, I'm afraid you are misunderstanding my post.

I did not express an opinion, I shared a set of 'facts' that are undisputable. You can ignore them at your leisure, (I grant you that right).

It is a fact that individuals with only one set of genes have, at different times in their life, completely different hair color. This is a well documented condition that everyone who is paying attention has witnessed. You don't even need to be a molecular biologist, or graduate at the top of your class, to understand this.

Given this obvious 'disconnect' between actual hair color and genetic makeup, it is clearly impossible to come to a specific conclusion regarding hair color using only genetic information.

That is NOT an opinion. It is a logical truth.

I appreciate your civil, albeit somewhat condescending, response.

regards,
frog

[chrisbaskett]

Ifida, was frog mentioned in the article?