I am not interested in arguing about what was said or we were led to believe. I agree that things were said that shouldn't have been. But there are many who are now saying the whole thing was made up/pretend. It wasn't. As for the financial details, I have never said anything about them, as I agree it needed clarification. It sounds to me like we agree on many things here. PCT was engaged with the UK partners. That is my only point that I will continue to defend, because it is completely the truth. All the other stuff falls in the category of unknown and fair questions for me. I don't talk to the company and I have no answers on the profits and ownership questions. But they did have a stake in the partner at one point, that is verified on the documents. Why that changed? I don't know. Why did it all break down? I don't know.
And really... this is a lot of wasted energy over what we can all agree is now a dead end.