History -- the original FDR FDIC was a GOV agency 100% backed by TREASURY
Then it went private with no statement on guarantee but with its legacy (Guarantee) and huge monster size - people assumed it was guaranteed. The so called Implicit guarantee
Note - as a broker-advisor - when I sold FNMA paper to clients it was required that I note that it did not have a guarantee from the GOV or even an executive branch guarantee (which is less than Treasury) . It did have a super private sector rating agency rating !!
NOW -- as I understand it --- while the conservatorship is in effect THERE IS AN EXPLICIT TREASURY guarantee !!
The question ---- may be - can the GOV allow exit from conservatorship without some insane level of capital ---- because IMO - the Treasury will STAY with explicit guarantee as it does now
By not EXPLICITLY guaranteeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS, the federal government keeps up to $13T+ off the liabilities side of the federal balance sheet.
How much longer do we have people believe in this?
Everyone seems to believe it, that the federal government has to cover agency MBS and TBTF deposits (and apparently not TBTF banks like SVB).
I heard that the Emperor wears no clothes, is that true! HeeeeHeeee ;-) !
"The US system of Federal Home Loan Banks, a key source of cash for regional banks, is seeking to raise about $64 billion through the sale of short-term notes, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
The offering comes amid a banking crisis that has toppled three lenders in less than a week. The FHLB system of 11 regional banks is a Depression-era backstop that private banks can use for short-term funding without the stigma of taking money from the Federal Reserve. It’s widely seen as a safety net and has been called the “lender of next-to-last resort” — a play on the nickname for the Fed’s famed.."