Replies to post #79594 on Good Gaming Inc (GMER)

[GoliathRulz]

This has been going on for over a year. In addition their solid commitment to not communicating has killed their user base.

Also, if you haven’t been playing then you don’t know the pain these guys have caused to the community. They are really bad on finding bugs and basically push to product broken stuff routinely. Not to mention they don’t play their own product in production and thus leave it to the community to find the problems. Not only that they let the crypto game sit broken for basically 6 months and still have not cleaned up the mess completely.

I’m not giving them a pass at this point. I have seen more capable teams on other projects and this entity is being underserved by being starved of resources and talent.

If the entity of GMER was sold off it would be much better for everyone if a real software developer took controlling interest. IMO.

[urge2surge]

Only catalyst is a viable licensing of a proprietary product in conjunction, with a legitimate game developer of scale. Everything else is noise. The Via One parent, if legit on the revenues, can reverse merger into GMER, change the symbol, ie VIAN, and develop good gaming as one of their divisions in the fold.
In the meantime I'll hold my 20% tax rate shares and maybe add below my initial costs on those shares. I'm no longer expecting bold and audacious events here. If something monumental happens, great. I believe they could have done a much better job on supporting and rewarding holders for the last 2 year's at minimum.
As a fellow investment club member said to me...."I'm holding some shares out of 'spite', just in case they deliver".
Lol...poignantly succinct..