Replies to post #67094 on Sun Pacific Holding Corp (SNPW)

[wallstreet1231]

“ It doesn't get clearer then that.”

Beg to differ, the tweet issued by snpw is clear, much clearer than the 8k. State that the 14c is cancelled in the 8k as it was stated in the tweet.



Sun Pacific Holding Corp
@SunPacificPower
·

We are pleased to announce we have canceled our 14C as we proceed forward with our plans $snpw #solar #ManufacturingJobs
https://otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16330479&guid=VR2-kHKJ0j12dth…
7:35 AM · Jan 24, 2023

Seems this straightforward wording would benefit the company as well. Why not. Why would anyone fight against such wording. SMH.

My opinions.

[chemist72]

Agree 100%. Only those wishing to spread FUD would argue that there is still a possibility of a reverse split based on the 14C filing which was filed on April 11, 2022.

This entire argument will become moot anyway on April 11, 2023 due to the following unambiguous statement in the 14C: "To authorize the Board the Option to effectuate a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split Option”), at the sole discretion of the Board within 12 months of this Information Statement ..."

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1343465/000149315222009611/formdef14c.htm

my opinions