Replies to post #103837 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[Kurt_Banoffee]

"The parties involved in a breach of contract may resolve the issue among themselves or in a court of law."

This is yet another argument attempting to use a banal statement to misdirect and mislead.

The salient point is that it was never a real* contract as evidenced by the numerous obvious errors and that fact that it was so poorly conceived that it was breached almost immediately.

*Real meaning there was a meeting of the minds with both sides intending for it to be a binding contract that both had the capacity to execute. Given that it's obvious that neither party even bothered to read it before signing, there really is no debate over this - that or Squires and Balchin are both incompetent to the point of being near illiterate.

There are to amtronic CC

You sure about that? Please point us to the evidence that Amtronics CC ever paid for them.

https://patentcenter.uspto.gov/applications/17024640

If the argument is that paying a bunch of shares for a failed company was worth it to get Jay "Ready Player One" Williams on the team, that may be one thing. If it's that QMC needed to buy blockchain technology to file that application, the assertion is clearly false.

Also note from the link provided that as of a few weeks ago, all the claims of the patent application have either been withdrawn or rejected and the application is effectively dead.

[shoondale]

QMC R&D is recruiting marks for the con job.

R&D and attempted business opportunities (check out the cost to develop a new pharmaceutical that ends up failing)

LMAO @ Skwyerz in the pharmaceutical industry. He can't complete a page in a coloring book and now we are trying this scam as a pharmaceutical company.