Problem with old Tim...is he has bought into the warrants are good for commons theory.
The reality is commons are fruit of a poison tree and will touch off many lawsuits which aren't yet ripe on a takings claim.
The takings claims were denied because... while the government has usurped 100% control of the companies and "rights" to 80% ownership... they've not actually done it yet. And, the judges have bought off on the "temporary" nature of the control ... the intangible rights / benefits of share holders having been only temporarily taken... ie... borrowed.
And the 5th amendment only considers takings... not borrowings... even if the value has been squandered. If you give back a dead carcass then, it wasn't taken.. only borrowed and the takings clause doesn't apply.
Complete the circuit... take the stock... and its... electrified.... takings kick in. lawsuit.
You do realize who exactly he "slapped down", right? It's "people [who] “talk their book,” and try to convince other investors to agree with them". That includes common-only shareholders who spout nonsense about the warrants being illegal, etc such as Bryndon Fisher. Tim Howard slapped them all down equally.
Singling out Glen as the lone target of Tim's post is laughable. It's hilarious how far into people's heads he is. Good on you, Glen. No need to pay rent when you have dozens of brains you reside in rent-free.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
