Replies to post #53888 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[PumpersExposed]

I don’t think so. What I know, is that there was a ton of rust, and debris and material that made the pipeline unusable for testing. That’s why Kyte took QS off the PRCI line. Not the reason you describe. I don’t really care what some guy at the PRCI supposedly claimed. I’m confident in what I heard from the horses mouth. Period.

Lol! First, anyone can search 'PRCI membership directory' and see this isn't some rusty 'ol line in mexico with some group of unknowns. The membership list is a whos who of the biggest companies on the planet with anything to do with oil. It's laughable to say the line was unuseable for testing, when that is the entire point of that loop.

Second, 'some guy' was Michael Whelan who was the vice president of Operations for said research council. If the world body of major oil players were ok with him having that role for 17 years there, i'd take his word over the scam artist Cecil Kyte. What did Michael say to me (direct quote from the call) aside from that the board saw nothing compelling in the results?
""PRCI- Well it’s been a… protracted process to try to figure out what’s next if anything because if you.. and I think your analysis of that first test is.. is pretty good.. I mean it’s a lot of holes in it.."".. So basically the issue I had with the results and testing, were the same issues these guys saw with it, not some rust. Face it, Kyte pulled the unit out of the PRCI before it was definitively proven to be a failure, with just enough data to have no exact answer so it could continue to be promoted, but still pointing to nothing. But that comes from actual experience in this field, vs 'hearing from the horses mouth' when that horse has been caught repeatedly lying, as well as halted by the SEC for lying in NR's. And Whelan would have no dog in the race, or financial interest in it succeeding, OR failing.. He would be neutral. Kyte on the other hand.. or are you admitting that what Kyte put out with respect to testing results from the PRCI was a lie if it was not a good site?

Not true at all. In my opinion the test was a success, because they got GOOD DATA that showed us all that the tech works.

Where is this data? 'good data' could simply mean they got data for xx amount of time without gaps in it.. but it was still a failure. NONE of this is ever quantified, clarified, or proven. NONE of Tao's work is peer reviewed.. NOTHING any legit company would do.

That’s a fact. And that’s important because it shows that a major Fortune 500 oil company with one of the most prolific pipelines in the northern hemisphere was seriously interested in the AOT. It also proves they would have paid millions to use the technology.

I worked with them, and I knew MANY in western Canadian management. They try lots of things out.. why wouldn't they? And they would have paid millions to me if my idea of a transporter to move oil from planet Xindi to Earth like in star trek worked as well!

Companies don’t just want to “put something to rest.” That’s nonsense. Multiple oil companies genuinely want AOT to work, and they want to help QSEP to get it to work.

Billion dollar companies don't just sit around like excited school kids 'wanting something to work'. They try it out, adopt, or discard. Like I said Kyte pulled the unit out of the PRCI with JUST ENOUGH open ended questions and hacked together data to make this still a maybe obviously to those companies. So yes, testing would put any questions to rest whether it worked or not. We all know how it worked out. And helping them to make it work (you don't 'get' something to work in every instance.. it either does or it doesn't) wouldn't entail kicking them off the line without paying them, and showing ZERO interest in the following years. Why would these oil companies waste years and years pushing oil at current prices if they thought this work, vs funding their research and testing for perhaps an exclusivity? Laughable.

It tells me they would have been willing to sign a contract to pay handsomely for AOT if the test was satisfactory to them.

Irrelevant when the test obviously failed. It's AMAZING how the cancellation of the TC contract happened the day after KM was signed.. AMAZING Kyte held out on that news to that day.. what amazing luck.. so KM wouldn't have seen that. But we know how that test went as well. Obviously KM was none too happy and didn't pay anything, when they were contractually obligated to do so. THAT SAYS SOMETHING.

To spell it out for you. It means that should any other test actually work, the likelihood of a fully executed sales contract is very high.

To spell it out for you. It means that should I win a lottery in the future, the likelihood of me being rich is very high.

The data on the condensate line was good. And that is amazing considering it was on CONDENSATE. Which is basically a diluent, and not a heavy crude oil which AOT works better on.

Where is this data? How does anyone know it was good? The compulsive liar Kytes word? If it was good, AGAIN, as I asked before, why didn't KM pay them then? Why didn't either KM or TCPL assist in getting this fixed and back on their line instead of wasting years pumping oil and losing money this thing supposedly would solve? Either of them could stroke a cheque for a coupe mil based on 10 minutes of revenue and just buy this company if they wanted.. own the rights to this for a pittance vs paying the numbers you pull out of the air..

The data was commensurate with the lab test, which we know were good. Yet another data point that tells me AOT works.

Where is this data???? What data point? They never release ANYTHING even though they say they will. Which lab test did it match? Where is this study, the numbers, the publication of ANYTHING?

Here are some past gems from "the horses mouth". I'd say the other end honestly.

"MAGChargr, our original product, was invented in Australia by a man seeking to find a simple, easily implemented solution to improve engine performance. "

Only the guy that put this out when this was called the ZEFs was shut down by the SEC over this fraud. But hey, look at the dyno testing numbers they put out!!! MUST WORK!!.
Notice the claims they make.. all quoted:

Eco Chargr -
"Proven by Research
Evaluated by the RAND Corporation and our ongoing development partner, Temple University, has published research internationally.
Patented Innovations"

"Emissions control devices which have in independent certification laboratory tests achieved levels better than CARB 2008, EPA 2010 and EURO 3 emissions standards"

MAGChargR -
"Proven by Research
Evaluated by the RAND Corporation and our ongoing development partner,
Temple University, has published research internationally"

Elektra -
"Proven by Research Ongoing development with Temple University who have published research internationally "

STWA has validated its product claims through rigorous testing and research conducted both in house and by independent certified testing laboratories around the world."

This statement was for the ZEFs, MKIV and Cat-Mate.. remember when the SEC halted this stock and asked Beggar specifically about those patents LOL?

"In order to gain and accelerate market acceptance by governmental regulatory officials, distributors, manufacturers, dealerships, and the aftermarket constituency, STWA has also performed extensive independent laboratory testing using government-standard equipment at the following certified facilities:

- National Motorcycle Quality Inspection & Certification Center; Shanghai, China
- Hong Kong Exhaust Emissions Laboratory (HKEEL), Hong Kong
- Automotive Emission Laboratory, Pollution Control Department (PCD), Bangkok,Thailand
- Olson/Ecologic Laboratory (OEL), California
- Northern California Diagnostics Laboratory (NCDL), California
- Automotive Testing and Development Services (ATDS), California

Yet like the AOTee, NO NUMBERS are ever put out.

And then we all remember 2009 interview when Kyte said he had sooooo much "unsolicited interest" in the Elektra, and that the company would be profitable in 2010... Then the China testing, NO DATA, Joule testing, NO DATA and on and on through Energy Tech Africa spinning the disks in the desert with DJ Barney Barrow, promoted by impresario Tim Nimmo, Iraq oil operators, Haven Flow Loop, blah blah blah.. Where is ETA now? I thought at that point in time the AOTee was ready for sale and these guys were gonna sell a whack load of them? The list of lies is soo long now it's a literal joke. But ya.. this HAS TO BE the time it isn't lol!