InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MrNormall

02/10/23 2:54 PM

#61476 RE: FEARANDGREED #61474

Calasse go bye bye soon!
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Yolo

02/10/23 2:57 PM

#61477 RE: FEARANDGREED #61474

Thank you. This allows me to respond to it in one place and then move on and ignore the trash arguments.

The OSC did not ask anything about intervention, nor even mention it once.



The Supreme Court of the United States makes it clear in Martin v. Wilks that there is no obligation for a non-party to intervene, the obligation is on the existing parties to join a required party.



The Supreme Court of Nevada makes it clear that in addition to there not being any burden to intervene on a non-party, there is an absolute judicial duty on the appellate court to join required parties. So even if the non-party lacks standing to appeal, the appellate court can raise the issue sua sponte and either join the non-party or reverse and remand.



I look forward to any citations refuting these points, but I'm not holding my breath.