InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hi_Lo

02/08/23 9:19 AM

#116282 RE: PDingus #116276

I think moste people would have done a better job at DD before taking on custodianship of this ticker and most prople woildn't have made so many unforced errors.

Now we have the share reduction ehich already seem problematic because of the actual controversies spelled out in the recent Sharp court filing:

Actual controversies have arisen and now exist between Plaintiff and Defendants



https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2319

actual controversy

n. a true legal dispute which leads to a genuine lawsuit rather than merely a "cooked up" legal action filed to get a court to give the equivalent of an advisory opinion. Federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, will only consider an "actual controversy", on appeal, since they will not give advisory (informal) opinions or make judgments on "friendly suits" filed to test the potential outcome.



Plus GVSI is not even SEC compliant which limits the quality of a merging candidate, if there even is one after all these delays - delays which most likely will continue with the recent actual controversies in court with the share cancelations.

No company will merge with GVSI if the shares are being contested.
Bearish
Bearish