Replies to post #113510 on Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[Yolo]

I checked and didn't see an attorney letter. Unless it is included as part of the Form 10, my assumption was that the SEC doesn't require an attorney letter. So while someone on Twitter said this is the same attorney used for both WNFT and SRNW, there was no attorney letter to which to compare.

Shocking that someone who constantly brags about being a former consultant with the OTC and proclaims he is the OTC WHIZ is still stumbling over this stuff.

It is quite the contradiction to see people worship him as an OTC genius and then watch the fumbles and unforced errors. Maybe he meant whizz like whizzinator.

[Hi_Lo]

GVSI is still not pink current while Sharp continues to fumble his way into trying to get this dumpster fire current like he has for the last year and a half. The filing of the attorney letter without stating who prepared it is just another in a long list of errors on Sharp's part. He also filed the financials with the wrong category and had to resubmit them which he had to own up to as his mistake.

Just a collection of unforced errors. What a mess!

I thought GVSI was going to be pink current (which was said ad nauseam) last year? I thought GVSI was going to get a merger (which was said ad nauseam) last year? I thought this was going to .10 on pink limited?

And now the share cancelation filed in court by George has a high probability of GVSI having up to eight lawsuits from shareholders whose shares Sharp wants to cancel.

Actual controversies have arisen and now exist between Plaintiff and Defendants

https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2319

actual controversy

n. a true legal dispute which leads to a genuine lawsuit rather than merely a "cooked up" legal action filed to get a court to give the equivalent of an advisory opinion. Federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, will only consider an "actual controversy", on appeal, since they will not give advisory (informal) opinions or make judgments on "friendly suits" filed to test the potential outcome.

Plus GVSI is not even SEC compliant which limits the quality of a merging candidate, if there even is one after all these delays - which most likely will continue with the recent actual controversies on court with the share cancelations.

No company will merge with GVSI if the shares are being contested.

[surfkast]

Maybe that is why the latest attorney letter is probably no good either? It does not show George's qualifications? (Or un qualifications?) ;-)

The latest letter.

2. Financial documents including: Balance Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2022. The financial document for this period was prepared by George Sharp.


The withdrawn Form 10 stated this:

Our sole officer and director, who will be responsible for preparing our financial statements and evaluating the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting is not qualified to do so.

George Sharp, our sole officer and director, has not been trained in accounting and has relevant but not extensive knowledge of United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to financial reporting or to being a public company generally and limited experience in preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.