Replies to post #70336 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

That’s one more reference than SFRX has…

given.

A wreck with $15B in treasure would be legendary and the rarest of the rare.

Any responsible salvor would put a name out there, not a nail along with a claim Mel Fisher’s Treasures emphatically denies.

If a wreck sank in the Juno area with $15B, the chances it isn’t in the history books and well known is nil.

Is it easier to make a bogus claim or provide a name?

I just shared the names of the only Spanish galleons that sank in 1554, which is what an affiliate referenced.

SFRX has been vague when dating the wreck, which means they don’t even know a potential identity.

Serious people doing serious salvage work compile data on wrecks with treasure and without treasure. That way the don’t spend decades looking for something that isn’t there, like these amateurs have, along with their partners.

Melbourne is a decades old project, and Judd partnered with OCS years before SFRX came along.

The Toy, if it works, needs someone competent to put them on a wreck with valuable cargo. To date, there’s no proof the Toy has scanned a wreck with valuable cargo.

In other words, it can’t find what isn’t there, I don’t care how many rockets Timmy has built.