InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hedge_fun

01/24/23 5:36 PM

#70244 RE: wlfr01 #70243

No. The Admiralty claim dates back to…….

the late 80’s. It’s referred to as the last one in (grandfathered in).

If there was 1/10th of $15B in treasure at Juno the site would be littered with treasure and cannons, and over the decades something substantial would have been found, but nothing has been.

The ship hasn’t even been identified.

A SFRX self appointed spokesperson (aka Crusty the Clown) is regurgitating a new claim in another forum that treasure and cannons must be under the recently discovered crust at Juno.

The anchor and ballast pile was somehow spared from this calamity.

Of course Crusty also used to claim the treasure was 5 miles from the ballast pile. I guess when he figured out how stupid that sounded so he decided to run with the new theory.

Regardless, ID the ship, show me the manifest, and we’ll break out the calculator.

On second thought, wouldn’t the Timmy Toy already know if the math was right?

And why are they still at Melbourne and coming up empty?

This “waiting on the Corp permit for Juno” mantra is not well thought out.

Melbourne is still listed as an active site and we’re told it only takes a weekend to find treasure.

WTF?

2 years working Toy targets and they have ZIP, ZERO, NADA.

Not even a trinket.