Replies to post #745564 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[familymang]

Rodney you are incorrect. The SCOTUS cases and the Lamberth trial cases have absolutely nothing to do with eachother.

1) SCOTUS remanded to see if we can prove that because Trump couldnt fire Watt his first 2 years we may be entitled to some remedy, so far 2 courts has said NO we arent (pending appeals now).
2) Not related to #1, SCOTUS also just declined to accept our petition to reverse the takings ruling (so the takings case is officially dead for good).
3) The Lamberth trial is over a potential breach of shareholder contract and Lamberth limited the liability to 1.6b + interest ($2-3/shr for JPS and 30c/shr for common). Retrial at some point this year.

Again Lamberth and SCOTUS have nothing to do with eachother.

[Donotunderstand]

R5

Judge tossed out 2-4 methods of calculating damage

Might your suggestion be one of them ?

the 1.5B or so was the only one the Judge allowed - as I recall

but I do not know if the approach of NWS >10% was presented ??

but it might have been judge tossed out?

[skeptic7]

If you believe Breyer was so "pro-sharehloders" and "pro-GSE's" shouldn't it have been 8 to 1?

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Rodney, only one case has been heard by the SCOTUS, right? That's the Collins case in the 5th Circuit. The Lamberth case is in the DC Circuit Federal.